Wickstrom’s Learning & Teaching Blog

December 7, 2010

Inquiry questions pursued

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 2:15 am

General areas of possible investigation:
Wiki or web based extension of the classroom
Media to increase collaboration

Specific inquiry questions?
“How can I use a wiki or web based platform to create a collaborative community in Planning 10 where students can share resources and ideas?
How can I increase classroom collaboration to foster a safe and open classroom?”

Secondary questions:
What happens when students share thoughts and each other’s work in a digital environment?
What sort of challenges are my students facing?
What are the challenges I will face for implementing new technologies?

Learning Reflections

If there is one thing I have learned in the past two years it’s that even with facebook I can’t poke my students enough to turn assignments in on time.

After two years of intentional technological thought and immplementation, how does technology fit into Ms. Wickstrom’s pedagogy?

Technology has changed our notions of what we consider to be forms of knowledge representation. I believe we need to allow our students to create content in the same forms that they are consuming it. Look no further than Facebook, Youtube, and Google to see a vast array of multimedia and visual texts, collaborative forums, and podcasts. These tools are the future of education, whether it takes place in the classroom or on the couch. It is imperative that we, as educators, embrace these emerging technologies so that we can truly connect with the students of the future. Writing, reading, listening and speaking will always be important.

Mobile phones, computers everywhere, hypertext, social networking, collaborative cognition (from Wikipedia on up), Google, text-messaging, Twitter, audiobooks, digital texts, text-to-speech, speech recognition, flexible formatting – these are not “add ons” to the world of education, they are the world of education. This is how humans in this century talk, read, communicate, and learn. And learning to use these technologies effectively, efficiently, and intelligently must be at the heart of our educational strategies.

Today it is all about how you learn to find information, how you build your professional and personal networks, how you learn, how to learn – because learning must be continuous.

Looking at how to extend the learning environment in a digital setting through the form of a web based platform has enabled me as an educator to get a broader picture of the student by allowing them to demonstrate their learning in more varied ways. Working with a social educational tool such as Edmodo enables students to create knowledge representations that are likely to be more personal, expressive, and revealing than the traditional pen and paper approach.

This semester I set out to research this tool which I thought could enhance my teaching practice and benefit student learning. I wanted to research and look more closely at how the added benefit of a web based tool could accentuate differentiated learning. I focused on the effect that introducing intuitive auditory and visual methods of representation would have on the classroom. I felt very proud of the class atmosphere that developed from the web based community. My students were connecting with one another through thoughts, video and peer samples, without teacher intervention.

Productivity and enjoyment enhanced daily class work and strengthened relationships between all members of that community. Deployment in the class became relatively easy and led to anecdotal notes, journal observations, and achievement/use checklists.

Digital Inquiry Questions

All the Right Type in Special Ed

How can I use technology with students who have a disability to enhance student success in the following three areas: cognitive development, self motivation, and engagement?

Sub Questions: (3 forms of feedback which will be compared and reported on)

  • Through self-evaluation how can my students understand the results and make improvements?
  • Through teacher evaluation how can my students understand the results and make improvements?
  • Through specific software evaluation i.e. All the Right Type how can my students understand the results and make improvements suggested by this form of software?
  • What other programs are available in the district that provide feedback on student learning?
  • How do students with a disability respond to the use of a computer?

Digital Recordings through Independent Educational Plans (IEP’s)

Questions:

  • How can I (use technology to) improve student learning with self-assessment?
  • How can I use technology to develop self-assessment strategies?
  • Our social learning network: Prezi, Voice threads, twitter, edmodo.
    How can I use voice threads to teach Planning 10 and transform media into a collaborative space where auditory learners can benefit?
  • How can I use a wiki or web based platform to create a collaborative community in Planning 10 where students can share resources and ideas?
  • How can I increase classroom collaboration to foster a safe and open classroom?

Growth in the Guiding Capacities

Reflective Practitioner Taking a comprehensive and reflective look at the key areas of my practice and solving the challenges my students face in their day to day lives. This includes adapting to the changing demands and expectations within our classrooms. As a teacher it is essential that we adapt to the changing demands and expectations within our classrooms. For instance, in recent years it seems as though our school population has become more diverse (with respect to individual student abilities), or perhaps the system is just becoming more efficient in it’s endeavor to recognize students with learning disabilities. During one of my field studies I researched students who were on an independent educational plan (IEP). I looked into how these students were being assessed and specifically how they were solving the challenges their disability presented. My findings revealed how unaware students were of how they learned or what their specific learning goals were as per their IEP’s.
Critical Practitioner I think it is relevant here to discuss ones philosophy of education and reassess frequently to see where your core values lie. As teachers it is our place to respond and reflect on the ways we teach and the varied assignments and assessments we provide to our students. The teacher should act as a facilitator rather than a transmitter of knowledge, as students learn better if they are actively creating their own meaning in the learning process. To accommodate the diverse learning styles of students, I believe they should be given choices in the classroom in terms of the types of assignments and projects where it is appropriate. As a teacher it is my role to plan lessons and create assignments that connect the learning in the classroom to the real world. If I can look at these statements and see whether I am true to them and change where I see necessary then indeed I am owning up to be a critical practitioner. With this being said findings in my field studies revealed that self-assessment plays a crucial part of students learning to think for themselves and being aware of the meaning they are creating in school and life.
Educational Leader, or leadership as an agent of change I am aware of my changing role as I move out of this program and continue to move toward best practice. At the start of this program conversations in my department prep room over lunch time and breaks have led to good collegial discussions surrounding technology and its many uses in the classroom. I have been a part of Surrey’s Leadership Development Program in Surrey for the past two years and have been sharing with other colleagues in the district. Currently with my recent undertaking around assessment I am continuing to share ideas and have shared my learning and questions in more formal workshop settings. I recently led a voice thread workshop at the CUEBC conference in November. Also, I have submitted a proposal for the STA May 2011. My capacity and repertoire to critically analyze the use of technology in educationally sound ways has grown tremendously. I feel confident and fearless in trying new digital tools with my students and assessing their value in differentiated learning settings. My involvement and constructive contribution to a technological community of practice has developed within the walls of Kwantlen Park. Myself and Adam have taken on a leadership role in developing a technology committee to share questions and offer practice time with digital tools.
Autonomous-Lifelong Learner I have completed a minor in Curriculum and Instruction with my Bachelor of Education Degree. I have completed coursework in foundations of reading and writing in the secondary grades, literature for young adults and alternative texts for young adults. Also I have taken professional development courses in designs for learning secondary social studies, designs for learning secondary language arts, curriculum and development: theory and practice, and equity, equality, and evidence: empirical approaches to social justice issues in education. With my experiences through university and now in the teaching world I am constantly reaching out to workshops within the district and within my school to improve my teaching practice. As a risk taker I feel I have elevated my game. I use to feel very strongly about taking the time to set up systems and always prepare a back up plan however, I feel confident and fearless in trying new digital tools with my students and assessing their value in diferentiated learning settings.
Facilitator of Learning I lead constructive conversations surrounding critical use of the internet and ethical uses of computers in the classroom. Also looking at ways to engage my students in a meaningful and powerful ways through technology. I connected with the article “finding a wondering” because I am starting to think about imperative questions such as: how do we help students deconstruct what they already know? How do we unplug kids and then plug them back in at appropriate times? In the article, “releasing the magination” author Maxine Greene, puts a strong importance on ‘teachers who provoke learners to pose their own questions, to teach themselves, to go at their own pace, [and] to name their worlds.” How do I do this and more importantly where do I go from here?
Knowledgeable Educator I feel empowered to be in charge of my own professional growth. Seeking out exciting educational opportunities to share with my students and or colleagues and involving them in the process of seeking out these prospects is equally important.
Supportive Colleague I have made an attempt to share the ideas and useful information with my colleagues. For instance, after an enlightening information session about inspiration led by Julia Poole I felt empowered to introduce this brilliant program to my ESL kids and the teachers in the ESL department.
User of Technology I am able to engage in the thought process that will enable me to structure the applications surrounding the varied ways to implement technology. For instance, this term I decided it would be best to get each student to purchase their own memory stick to use on a daily/weekly basis. I am still working on ways to incorporate and gently transition my students and I into a technologically sound framework. I am continuing to develop ways to assess student learning through the use of technology. My next steps will be to remain on the cutting edge of emerging technologies and continue with conversations neighbouring assessment and technology.

Reflection and Considerations

What difference do you want to make in your continuing work as an educator?

In my continuing work as an educator, I would like to maintain my work through the integration of technology into the classroom. At the same time encourage and support my colleagues on a similar journey of digital literacy.

How will you continue to shape your role as a teacher/leader within the educational community? (What might the future hold?)

I plan on attending technological seminars, keeping involved and up to date on the latest web tools that build on the digital technologies that can have lasting impacts and benefits to the educational community.

Recently, I led a workshop at CUEBC and I have put in a proposal for the STA day to lead a seminar on how to make and share effective presentations. Also, I would like to share a social networking site that has been praised for its academic and teaching advantages.

Who is Ms. Wickstrom? Sharing my learning with my students through prezi

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 2:10 am
.prezi-player { width: 550px; } .prezi-player-links { text-align: center; }http://prezi.com/bin/preziloader.swf

Glogster a Bio Poem: A student sharing who she is

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 2:06 am

Who is Ms. Wickstrom?

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 2:03 am

http://prezi.com/xqhind1w6hrv/who-is-ms-wickstrom/

August 27, 2010

Specific inquiry questions I am considering:

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 5:25 pm

How can I increase classroom collaboration to foster a safe and open classroom?
How can I use a wiki or web based platform to create a collaborative community in Planning 10 where students can share resources and ideas?
How can I use voice threads to teach Planning 10 and transform media into a collaborative space where auditory learners can benefit?

April 28, 2010

Field Study: April 28, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 6:13 pm

Field study Sharing
My question(s) are:

How can I use technology with students who have a disability to enhance student success in the following three areas: cognitive development, self motivation, and engagement?
Sub Questions: (3 forms of feedback which will be compared and reported on)
Through self-evaluation how can my students understand the results and make improvements?
Through teacher evaluation how can my students understand the results and make improvements?
Through specific software evaluation i.e. All the Right Type how can my students understand the results and make improvements suggested by this form of software?
What other programs are available in the district that provide feedback on student learning?
How do students with a disability respond to the use of a computer?








Background Information

Why did I choose this question? What motivated me?

What learning theories are behind my inquiry?

Who are the thinkers who help(ed) me frame my thinking in this area?

Since typing is an important primary skill and plays a strong role in language acquisition which is an important skill set for students. My motivation for integrating this technology with lower level kids was to find an appropriate piece of software that could provide meaningful feedback and usefulness for the students. It provides me with an excellent source of data collected from a wide variety of students with special disabilities so that as I move forward in my teaching career I can draw from this data so that I can work effectively with the student right from the start.

Learning theories

Behaviourism: Pavlov, Constructivism/ Social Constructivism: Piaget, Multiple intelligences: Gardner Instructivist/ Objectivist.

Here are two examples that helped me with understanding my instruction techniques: In the Objectivism / Instructivism learning theory, knowledge exists independently of the learner, and is transferred to the student by the teacher. As a teacher-centered model, the instructivist view is exhibited

by the dispensing of information to the student through the lecture format. This theory requires the student to passively accept information

and knowledge as presented by the instructor. While this method has been the basis of education for centuries, it does have drawbacks, especially in the online class. In contrast the constructivist learning theory, where the learner constructs new knowledge through a process of analyzing new information and comparing it to previous knowledge. Student-centered, rather than teacher-centered, the constructivist theory is best exemplified by instructors who provide guidance, rather than spoon feeding knowledge to the student in the lecture hall. The student is in control of whether or not he or she learns, not the instructor. In addition, the advantage of the computers has allowed me to reach students through multiple intelligences.

Resources
Title/ author/ publisher/ date
How was this helpful or informative?

Adapted from Dana, N. & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The Reflective Educator’s Guide to Classroom Research, 2nd ed.

Chapter 6, pp. 133-163.

LTT Surrey, September 2009

"Instructivism Vs Constructivism." EzineArticles Submission – Submit Your Best Quality Original Articles For Massive Exposure, Ezine Publishers Get 25 Free Article Reprints. Web. 19 Nov. 2009. <http://ezinearticles.com/?Instructivism-Vs-Constructivism&id=1857834&gt;.

Marzano, R. (2005). What works in Schools (PowerPoint presentation). Available: www.marzanoandassociates.com/pdf/ShortVersion.pdf

Design of the Inquiry
Procedures
Information collection
Information analysis

a. Procedures

Research of procedural knowledge of the technology

Testing of software

Daily practice of all the right type including reinforcement of the following: pronunciation practice, hand positioning, and eye contact.

b. Data collection

Observational notes: Anecdotal Information collected & recorded on a daily basis

Interaction and questions

End results from program/levels: All the Right type was able to track levels, scores and ultimately skills that are strong and weak.

c. Data analysis

Comparison of data

Compare and report on the following three types of feedback: Teacher Feedback

Student Feedback

Software Feedback

Information analysis took place on a weekly basis where I had informal conversations with each student. Each student was able to demonstrate how much of the results they were able to understand

Reflection on data

Sharing and feedback of data collected

DATA: -students improved hand/finger positioning and good posture

-engagement levels increased. Student a remained in his seat for an entire fifteen minutes

-attendance increased and less classroom management

-pronunciation of words improved

-students became more familiar with sounds of words and their spelling, more able to spell a word correctly (i.e. spelling test results improved)

-students benefited from structure and consistency of using this program. Printable awards to promote positive reinforcement. Students anticipated the start of each class to commence with their typing practice.

Students worked at their own pace, allowing teachers to monitor typing posture and technique

Problem was that for my particular students the feedback the program provided was difficult for my students to understand.

Share learning statements or "claims" supported with data.

I am learning that interacting with computers increases student’s enthusiasm to learn. I came to this conclusion based on the high level of focus and concentration exhibited by my students. Specifically when students were able to progress

I am learning that students with disabilities exhibit more confidence in their learning when interacting with a neutral non emotional entity. I came to this conclusion based on the eagerness of students to be very during the use of the program.

I am learning how to manage the knowledge gaps in the technology I am using and finding new ways to teach the learning goal rather than the technology itself. I came to this conclusion based on the confusion my students went through when I tried to explain how to use the technology.

Concluding thoughts:
Where I am now (what I believe, what’s changed or clarified in my practice and/or in my teaching theory)?
Where I might go next?

I believe I am more understanding and empathetic to learners with a disability. I am more apt address the individual needs of my students when performing these exercises.

Something that has been clarified for me is that there are beneficial third party technology solutions that can be implemented in the classroom.

Next, I would like to continue to build on assessment specifically looking at peer and self assessment in the classroom.


April 26, 2010

Field Study # 3: April 28, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 6:11 pm

Field Study # 3: April 28, 2010

Question: How can I use technology with students who have a disability to enhance student success in the following three areas: cognitive development, self motivation, and engagement?

Sub Questions: (3 forms of feedback which will be compared and reported on)

Through self-evaluation how can my students understand the results and make improvements?

Through teacher evaluation how can my students understand the results and make improvements?

 Through specific software evaluation i.e. All the Right Type how can my students understand the results and make improvements suggested by this form of software?

 What other programs are available in the district that provide feedback on student learning?

How do students with a disability respond to the use of a computer?

Field Study # 3: April 21, 2010

Semester Portfolio Summary Criteria

Portfolio Elements

Essential Questions
(Remember that not all of these questions
will apply to your learning in each case)

Notes

Learning Statements

I am learning to… or about… or how As I look at the “big picture” of how I’ve grown this semester, what over-arching learning(s) do I see?

What is changing in my practice and my thinking? How am I participating differently in my various communities?

Overall, technology has changed our notions of what we consider to be forms of knowledge representation. I believe we need to allow our students to create content in the same forms that they are consuming content, that being an increasing amount of multimedia and visual texts. Writing will always be important but perhaps you can think of ways to use technology to get a fuller picture of the student by allowing them to demonstrate their learning in more varied ways.

My learning thus far has been strong in assessment.  It has been where my time has been spent in research, inquiry and in gathering data. 

Reflection

What is important about this learning or this change in my thinking?
How did I go about learning this?
What changes might this create for me?
What tensions or puzzles is this learning
raising?

-show blog

-plentiful amounts of research in the field which has strengthened good practice and shaped pedagogy
-more research than planning and implementation
-finding it difficult to balance these two out.  Not knowing when to leave the concrete and drift to the abstract and take risks.
-Moving away from things that have already been done. I guess I feel like I need to reinvent the wheel in some form.

-still having difficulties and concerns in regards to good internet/computer practices for my students. 

Evidence

How does my learning show in my life, practice or language?
What are some tangible or narrative
examples of this?

Some Artefacts are:
-pictures on blog of students improving their skill set
-show self-assessment samples of student feedback and criteria that we created as teacher/student/IEP:
This particular field study helped me to understand the importance of individual and repeated goal setting and how these constant conversations around goals increased their awareness of which direction they needed to focus their learning.

Connection to a learning theory,
thinker or
educational
framework.

Who are the thinkers or educators that have shaped my learning?
What theories do I draw from?
What texts, articles or resources have shaped my learning this semester?

Instructivist: a learning theory, where the knowledge exists independently of the learner, and is transferred to the student by the teacher. As a teacher-centered model, the instructivist view is exhibited by the dispensing of information to the student through the lecture format.  This is where the implementation of the technology I have used would contradict the outcome.  This is a paradigm I have tried to step away from and equally as much the control that comes with it.

Behaviourism: Pavlov

Constructivism/ Social Constructivism: Piaget, vigotsky
In the constructivist learning theory, the learner constructs new knowledge through a process of analyzing new information and comparing it to previous knowledge and experiences.  Student-centered, rather than teacher-centered, the constructivist theory is best exemplified by instructors who provide guidance and support throughout the process.  This theory has helped to support the implementation of technology successfully in my practice.  This is where we have to focus on the learner in thinking about learning (not on the subject/lesson to be taught).

Multiple intelligences: Gardner

Self-Assessment in Capacities

How have I grown in particular capacities?
What is my current level of development in these particular capacities?
What might come next for me?
What capacities might I want to address in the coming learning?

My growth in the capacities:
Reflective Practitioner: taking a comprehensive and reflective look at the key areas of my practice specifically, assessment and solving the challenges my students face in their day to day lives i.e. as per their IEP’s.
This includes adapting to the changing demands and expectations within our classrooms. Here in my third field study I have encountered questions and research which will guide my teaching for the future.

Critical Practitioner, I think it is relevant here to discuss ones philosophy of education and reassess frequently to see where your core values lie. As teachers it is our place to respond and reflect on the ways we teach and the varied assignments and assessments we provide to our students.  The teacher should act as a facilitator rather than a transmitter of knowledge, as students learn better if they are actively creating their own meaning in the learning process.  With this being said self-assessment is a crucial part of students learning to think for themselves and being aware of the meaning they are creating in school and life.
Educational Leader, although I have not led any workshops I am aware of my changing role as I move through this program.  At the start of this program conversations in my department prep room over lunch time and breaks have led to good collegial discussions surrounding technology and its many uses in the classroom. Currently with my recent undertaking around assessment I can see myself sharing ideas and perhaps even leading a workshop for others.   I plan to push myself and help share my learning and questions with others.
Goal: lead a workshop in my school or in the district. I have been a part of Surrey’s Leadership Development Program in Surrey for the past two years and have been sharing with other colleagues in the district.

Vision or Goals

Where do I go from here? What do I want to learn?

I would like to continue to build on my skill set through job embedded learning like field studies, research and trial and error. 
I would like to continue to throw things out that aren’t working and continue to explore new technologies and how they relate to my students lives.

 

October 19, 2009

Field Study: How can I improve student learning through self-assessment

Filed under: 2008-2009 Learning — wickstrom1 @ 8:05 pm

Question: How can I (use technology to) improve student learning with self-assessment?

How can I use technology to develop self-assessment strategies?This could be through the use of computers i.e. video, voice over, online quizzes, immediate feedback via first class ect . .

Sub Questions: what skills, what strategies do kids need to do assessment?

What happens when you enable more choice and less control in respect to assessment?

What happens when I let students give more peer and self assessment?

My inquiry project is very similar to the program we are all in. Specifically, developing through self assessment has been a core value of our program.  We have all been enabled to undertake self inquiry and therefore grow in different ways.  We all come from different places and this program has been all about developing our own unique framework of self-assessment. Measuring ones learning has always been a difficult interpretive task that comes with great controversy.  With special attention to self-assessment it can be difficult teaching students how to assess their own learning.  However, if given specific tools students may be able to play an active role in the assessment of their own individual learning needs.  For example, students need to receive appropriate and focused feedback early and often.  Also, students need to be actively involved in the classroom assessment efforts in order to improve their learning.

For this inquiry I have selected four students who have Individual Education Plans (IEP’s) and given them a set of questions: What are your goals in your Individual Education Plan? What can teachers do to help you reach your IEP goals? What will you do individually to reach your IEP goals? How do you know you have learned something? How will you use what you have learned? (Relate this to the BASES model: Building Academic Social and Employment Skills) Why is this learning important?  Once students have answered the questions to the best of their knowledge they will be filmed or recorded.  The purpose of filming is for students to identify their own improvements rather than the teacher revealing them.  Once students are filmed I will then proceed with a discussion or IEP meeting and soon after the same questions are given for a second time.  After the questions are completed students will be recorded again in order to complete the before and after process of my experiment.  Once both filming sessions are complete students will watch both sets of film and make observations on the outcome.

Background Research

 I agree that “classroom assessment and grading practices have the potential not only to measure and report learning but also to promote it” (McTighe, O’Connor, 2005).

 The 6 Big AFL Principles

1. Learning Intentions

PURPOSE: let students know (in language they understand) what they are expected to learn

2. Criteria

PURPOSE: work with learners to develop criteria so they know what quality looks like

3. Questions

PURPOSE: increase quality questions to show evidence of learning

4. Feedback

PURPOSE: Increase the amount of descriptive feedback and decrease evaluative feedback

5. Self and Peer Assessment

PURPOSE: involve learners more in self and peer assessment

6. Ownership

PURPOSE: Have students communicate their own learning with others outside the classroom (metacognition)

Self-Assessment or Assessment as Learning

“Assessment explicitly designed to promote learning is the single most powerful tool we have for raising achievement” Black & William (1998)

“When they assess for learning teachers use the classroom assessment process and the continuous flow of information about student achievement that it provides in order to advance, not merely check on, student learning.” Rick Stiggins

This type of formative assessment is ongoing in the classroom

  • Student assessment: self and peer
  • Student self-monitoring, self-managing and self-modifying
  • Provides students with information on their own learning
  • Prompts students to consider how they can continue to improve their own learning
  • Answers the Question, “How can assessment motivate students to reflect and review their learning?” (metacognition)

Assessment techniques from Diane Heacox’s book Differentiating Instruction in the Classroom”IF

Four Minutes:

WHAT?                                                           NOW WHAT?

What did I learn?                                               How will I use what I have learned?

SO WHAT?                                                     CONFUSED?

Why is this important?                           One question or puzzlement

 Action plan      

Educational purposes and rationale

I anticipate higher level thinking and research based around pedagogy and assessment with enhance my deliberate teaching and in turn student learning. 

I am building a repertoire of things to use in my educational endeavour to enhance student learning through assessment.

Autonomous-Lifelong Learner: Within the territory of assessment comes the constant notion for professional development specifically, self-assessment which is still changing and unraveling.  As a teacher and a risk taker I am constantly trying new things and learning to become flexible in countless situations.  However, I do like to take the time to set up systems and always have a back up plan in case of need.

Reflective Practitioner, taking a comprehensive and reflective look at the key areas of my practice specifically, assessment and solving the challenges my students face in their day to day lives. As a teacher it is essential that we adapt to the changing demands and expectations within our classrooms. Here with my first field study underway I hope to encounter questions and research which will guide my teaching.

Critical Practitioner, I think it is relevant here to discuss ones philosophy of education and reassess frequently to see where your core values lie. As teachers it is our place to respond and reflect on the ways we teach and the varied assignments and assessments we provide to our students.  The teacher should act as a facilitator rather than a transmitter of knowledge, as students learn better if they are actively creating their own meaning in the learning process.  With this being said self-assessment is a crucial part of students learning to think for themselves and being aware of the meaning they are creating in school and life.

Facilitator of Learning, trying to lead constructive conversations surrounding critical assessment and the importance of living up to ones standards and ones standards only remains to be crucial to successful self-assessment.  In the article “finding a wondering” made me start to think about imperative questions such as: how do we help students deconstruct what they already know?  Similarly, author Maxine Greene discusses the “teachers who provoke learners to pose their own questions, to teach themselves, to go at their own pace, [and] to name their worlds.”  

Knowledgeable Educator, indeed I do feel empowered to be in charge of my own professional growth.  Seeking out exciting educational opportunities and research to share with my students and colleagues which in turn will help involve them in the process of constructing meaning is equally important.

Supportive Colleague, here I plan to share and discuss ideas and information as I uncover it.  I like to work with others and have a tenacity to use others input and change it to make it my own.  For instance, a few months ago after an enlightening information session with inspiration led by Julia Poole I felt empowered to introduce this brilliant program to my ESL kids and the teachers in the ESL department.  

Educational Leader, although I have not led any workshops I am aware of my changing role as I move through this program.  Recently in my department prep room over lunch time and breaks I have started to have good collegial discussions surrounding technology and its many uses in the classrooms. Currently with my recent undertaking around assessment I can see myself sharing ideas and perhaps even leading a workshop for others.   

User of Technology, I am still working on ways to incorporate and gently transition my students and I into a technologically sound framework.  With assessment I will be able to find multiple ways to use technology to benefit student learning.  My next steps will be to read and continue with conversations neighboring assessment and technology.

Strategies for documentation (List ways you will collect evidence showing your learning and the impact of your inquiry

On yourself and others):

Artefacts that students have produced i.e. photos (before and after classroom artifavts), anecdotal notes of before and after, reflections on my blog, self-evaluation rubrics, journaling, interviews, surveys, sociograms, data analysis, drawing conclusions, ect . . .

Summarizing and representing strategies (Suggest ways that you might represent your learning to your mentor and

Questions, showing growth, visuals, ect . . .

I am learning to . . .ask questions:

How have I responded with the new idea or strategy?

How I have tried something new?

What were the challenges?

What worked?

What got thrown out?

Frustration with students not being able to be filmed

What is experienced or seen?

What have you learned about your students and their learning?I am learning to . . .

• identify and pursue questions that guide thoughtful inquiry;

• document, describe, analyze and critically reflect on what I have learned through the inquiry process;

• discuss how this learning will influence my future work as an educator;

• provide carefully selected evidence of learning in a well-organized and personally meaningful portfolio snapshot;

• evaluate growth in relation to identified program capacities.

Findings

When students received the first set of questions I noticed reluctance and hesitation in respect to completion.  After their IEP meeting students were able to recall and remember their IEP goals much better and in turn communicate these needs to the classroom teacher and furthermore be able to advocate for their rights. 

Out of the four students I interviewed three out of four were not sure which goals they were working towards. 

After students participated in an IEP meeting and had the opportunity to absorb important goals that governed their individual education plan, students were more inclined to work on these goals and show evidence of their learning.  In his piece “What Works in Schools” author, Marzano (2005) details that students need to know what learning targets they are responsible for mastering, and at what level.  He also adds that “students who can identify what they are learning significantly outscore those who cannot” (Marzano, 2005).  When I provided a clear and understandable vision of the learning target students were able to make significant achievements. 

Another learning theory behind my inquiry is the constructivist approach which is predicated on the idea of student autonomy.  In her article “Choices for Children” author, Alfie Kohn writes “students need to view learning as something under their control rather than disembodied, objectified, subject matter” (Kohn, 2003).  It was important for students to become involved in the process.  When my four students were involved several things were achieved.  More student control over their education, evaluation felt less punitive and overall an important learning experience.  Furthermore, “students can derive enormous intellectual benefits” (Kohn, 2003) from the process of being involved.  

When undertaking this project it was important to identify the strategies that were essential for students to understand in order to show improvements.  Lengthy discussions in small and large groups were necessary to begin how to get to know ourselves as learners.  This involved reflecting on their performance, product, thinking and learning.  Students were to monitor and regulate what they are doing and while they were doing it.  They were to evaluate the quality of their work and knowledge.  Furthermore, helping students set realistic goals and helping them plan ways to achieve these goals were the most challenging.

As soon as I as their teacher put emphasis and weight on self and peer assessments students began to take the process seriously.  Many students found the self-assessment process and the results useful and valuable.  One of my students began to write one star and one wish on the bottom of his work even when I did not ask.  The process of engaging students in their own work seemed to happen naturally.  Students began to become engaged on a variety of levels.  We talked about assessing ourselves in other aspects of our lives and with different lenses.  This concept and idea seemed to bring them into other things such as growth as an individual and perhaps self-actualization.

Learning Statements

I learned that students on individual education plans (IEP’s) benefited greatly from self-assessment led discussions and frequent goal setting meetings.  When I interviewed students many reported that the revision of their goals and repeated goal setting increased their awareness of which direction they needed to focus their learning. Also, many students with IEP’s are reminded to communicate with their classroom teachers about their specific learning needs.  In a way, students are encouraged to become advocates for their own education.

Bibliography

Boud, D.  (1995).  Enhancing Learning through Self-Assessment, 1-247.

Kohn, A.  (2005). Choices for Children: Why and How to Let Students Decide, 1-12.

Marzano, R. (2005).  What works in Schools (PowerPoint presentation).  Available: www.marzanoandassociates.com/pdf/ShortVersion.pdf

McTighe, J., & O’Connor, K. (2005). Seven Practices Practices for Effective Learning. Assessment to Promote Learning, 63(3), 10-17.

Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs Wikis, Podcasts, and other powerful Web Tools for Classrooms . Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

 

August 14, 2009

A snapshot of our learning

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 9:31 pm
IMG_1220

When light meets darkness
When light meets darkness

IMG_1193IMG_1192

Flashlight fun: working with shutter speed and aperature settings

Capacities Artifact

Filed under: Uncategorized — wickstrom1 @ 4:24 pm
Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.